Xeon w9-3475X vs Silver 4214R

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon w9-3475X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	613	49
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	33.88	18.36
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	Intel Xeon Silver	no data
Architecture codename	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)	Sapphire Rapids
Release date	24 February 2020 (4 years ago)	1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$705	no data
Current price	$403 (0.6x MSRP)	$3898

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4214R has 85% better value for money than Xeon w9-3475X.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon w9-3475X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	12 (Dodeca-Core)	36
Threads	24	72
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.5 GHz	4.8 GHz
Bus support	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	768 KB	80K (per core)
L2 cache	12 MB	2 MB (per core)
L3 cache	16.5 MB	82.5 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	Intel 7 nm
Die size	no data	4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature	79 °C	74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	74 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon w9-3475X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	FCLGA3647	FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon w9-3475X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
TSX	+	+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	+
Status	Launched	Launched

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon w9-3475X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	+	+
SGX	no data	-
OS Guard	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon w9-3475X are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon w9-3475X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2400	DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size	1 TB	4 TB
Max memory channels	6	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	115.212 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon w9-3475X.

PCIe version	3.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	48	112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

w9-3475X outperforms Silver 4214R by 255% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	11.86	42.16
Recency	24 February 2020	1 January 2023
Physical cores	12	36
Threads	24	72
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	300 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon w9-3475X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---