EPYC 9634 vs Xeon Silver 4210R

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4210R
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 100 Watt
9.77
EPYC 9634
2022
84 cores / 168 threads, 290 Watt
69.79
+614%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Xeon Silver 4210R by a whopping 614% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9634 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking7298
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.919.83
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Genoa
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$511$10,304
Current price$428 (0.8x MSRP)$3950 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4210R has 153% better value for money than EPYC 9634.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9634 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)84
Threads20168
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache640 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache10 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache13.75 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9634 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFCLGA3647SP5
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9634. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9634 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9634 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9634. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9634.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4210R 9.77
EPYC 9634 69.79
+614%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Xeon Silver 4210R by 614% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Silver 4210R 15110
EPYC 9634 107944
+614%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Xeon Silver 4210R by 614% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.77 69.79
Recency 24 February 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 10 84
Threads 20 168
Cost $511 $10304
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 290 Watt

The EPYC 9634 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4210R in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4210R and EPYC 9634, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4210R
Xeon Silver 4210R
AMD EPYC 9634
EPYC 9634

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 37 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4210R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9634 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4210R or EPYC 9634, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.