Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Silver 4210

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4210
2019
10 cores / 20 threads, 85 Watt
8.51
+25.1%
Xeon Bronze 3206R
2020
8 cores / 8 threads, 85 Watt
6.80

Xeon Silver 4210 outperforms Xeon Bronze 3206R by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Bronze 3206R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8851020
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.62no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency9.477.57
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Bronze 3206R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads208
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.9 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache640 KBno data
L2 cache10 MBno data
L3 cache13.75 MB11 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C78 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Bronze 3206R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Bronze 3206R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Bronze 3206R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Bronze 3206R are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Bronze 3206R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size1 TB1 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Bronze 3206R.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4210 8.51
+25.1%
Xeon Bronze 3206R 6.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4210 13520
+25.2%
Xeon Bronze 3206R 10797

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.51 6.80
Recency 2 April 2019 1 January 2020
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 8

Xeon Silver 4210 has a 25.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 25% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

Xeon Bronze 3206R, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

The Xeon Silver 4210 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Bronze 3206R in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4210 and Xeon Bronze 3206R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4210
Xeon Silver 4210
Intel Xeon Bronze 3206R
Xeon Bronze 3206R

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 46 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3206R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4210 or Xeon Bronze 3206R, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.