Ryzen 5 1600AF vs Xeon Silver 4210
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Silver 4210 and Ryzen 5 1600AF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 885 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 19.67 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Xeon Silver | no data |
Power efficiency | 9.47 | no data |
Architecture codename | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 11 October 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $501 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Silver 4210 and Ryzen 5 1600AF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 20 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Multiplier | 22 | no data |
L1 cache | 640 KB | 96K (per core) |
L2 cache | 10 MB | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 13.75 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 78 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Silver 4210 and Ryzen 5 1600AF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA3647 | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Silver 4210 and Ryzen 5 1600AF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and Ryzen 5 1600AF are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB | no data |
Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.212 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4210 and Ryzen 5 1600AF.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 2 April 2019 | 11 October 2019 |
Physical cores | 10 | 6 |
Threads | 20 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon Silver 4210 has 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.
Ryzen 5 1600AF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 30.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Silver 4210 and Ryzen 5 1600AF. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Silver 4210 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 1600AF is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4210 and Ryzen 5 1600AF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.