Ultra 7 256V vs Xeon Silver 4209T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4209T
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 70 Watt
6.98
Core Ultra 7 256V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.16
+74.2%

Core Ultra 7 256V outperforms Xeon Silver 4209T by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4209T and Core Ultra 7 256V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1000631
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.14no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency9.4467.69
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4209T and Core Ultra 7 256V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache512 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache11 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature91 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4209T and Core Ultra 7 256V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4209T and Core Ultra 7 256V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4209T and Core Ultra 7 256V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4209T and Core Ultra 7 256V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4209T and Core Ultra 7 256V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4209T and Core Ultra 7 256V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes484

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4209T 6.98
Ultra 7 256V 12.16
+74.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4209T 11080
Ultra 7 256V 19320
+74.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.98 12.16
Recency 2 April 2019 24 September 2024
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon Silver 4209T has 100% more threads.

Ultra 7 256V, on the other hand, has a 74.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 311.8% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 256V is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4209T in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4209T is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 256V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4209T and Core Ultra 7 256V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4209T
Xeon Silver 4209T
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Core Ultra 7 256V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4209T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 256V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4209T or Core Ultra 7 256V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.