i5-13400F vs Xeon Silver 4116

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4116
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
9.27
Core i5-13400F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.84
+70.9%

Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4116 and Core i5-13400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking821421
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.5455.20
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency10.3223.06
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,002$196

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13400F has 896% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4116.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4116 and Core i5-13400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.6 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache768 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4116 and Core i5-13400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Core i5-13400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4116 and Core i5-13400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Core i5-13400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Core i5-13400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5, DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GB192 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Core i5-13400F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4116 9.27
i5-13400F 15.84
+70.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4116 14723
i5-13400F 25165
+70.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Silver 4116 868
i5-13400F 2299
+165%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Silver 4116 5676
i5-13400F 10923
+92.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.27 15.84
Recency 11 July 2017 4 January 2023
Physical cores 12 10
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Silver 4116 has 20% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

i5-13400F, on the other hand, has a 70.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4116 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4116 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4116 and Core i5-13400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4116
Xeon Silver 4116
Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 16 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3153 votes

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4116 or Core i5-13400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.