Xeon E-2468 vs Silver 4112

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4112
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 85 Watt
4.06
Xeon E-2468
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.92
+317%

Xeon E-2468 outperforms Xeon Silver 4112 by a whopping 317% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon E-2468 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1415388
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.9796.15
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency4.5224.63
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$473$426

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2468 has 3137% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4112.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon E-2468 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Threads816
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8.25 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon E-2468 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon E-2468. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon E-2468 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon E-2468 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon E-2468. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size768 GB128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon E-2468.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4112 4.06
Xeon E-2468 16.92
+317%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4112 6446
Xeon E-2468 26870
+317%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.06 16.92
Recency 11 July 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E-2468 has a 316.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2468 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4112 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon E-2468, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4112
Xeon Silver 4112
Intel Xeon E-2468
Xeon E-2468

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2468 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4112 or Xeon E-2468, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.