Xeon 6325P vs Silver 4112

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4112
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 85 Watt
4.06
Xeon 6325P
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
9.96
+145%

Xeon 6325P outperforms Xeon Silver 4112 by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1554894
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.5776.54
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency1.857.00
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$473$281

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6325P has 4775% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4112.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Threads88
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8.25 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size768 GB128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon 6325P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Silver 4112 4.06
Xeon 6325P 9.96
+145%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4112 6521
Xeon 6325P 16013
+146%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.06 9.96
Recency 11 July 2017 24 February 2025
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon 6325P has a 145.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 54.5% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 6325P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Silver 4112 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4112
Xeon Silver 4112
Intel Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6325P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Silver 4112 and Xeon 6325P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.