Atom C3508 vs Xeon Silver 4112

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4112
2017, $473
4 cores / 8 threads, 85 Watt
3.74
+256%

Xeon Silver 4112 outperforms Atom C3508 by a whopping 256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16832704
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.45no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.863.94
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date11 July 2017 (8 years ago)15 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$473no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon Silver 4112 and Atom C3508: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplier2616
L1 cache256 KB224 KB
L2 cache4 MB8 MB
L3 cache8.25 MB8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4112 and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4112 and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size768 GB256 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and Atom C3508.

PCIe version3.03
PCI Express lanes488
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Silver 4112 3.74
+256%
Atom C3508 1.05

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4112 6545
+257%
Samples: 19
Atom C3508 1831
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.74 1.05
Recency 11 July 2017 15 August 2017
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 11 Watt

Xeon Silver 4112 has a 256% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Atom C3508, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 673% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon Silver 4112 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom C3508 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Silver 4112 and Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.