Xeon D-1577 vs Silver 4110

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4110
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
6.43
Xeon D-1577
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 45 Watt
7.33
+14%

Xeon D-1577 outperforms Xeon Silver 4110 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon D-1577 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1049979
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.131.90
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverIntel Xeon D
Power efficiency7.1615.42
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)24 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501$1,176

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4110 has 223% better value for money than Xeon D-1577.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon D-1577 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Multiplier2113
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache11 MB1.5 MB (per core)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data306.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon D-1577 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon D-1577. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon D-1577 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon D-1577 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon D-1577. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon D-1577.

PCIe version3.02.0/3.0
PCI Express lanes4824
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data6
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data+
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4110 6.43
Xeon D-1577 7.33
+14%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4110 10220
Xeon D-1577 11645
+13.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.43 7.33
Recency 11 July 2017 24 February 2016
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon Silver 4110 has an age advantage of 1 year.

Xeon D-1577, on the other hand, has a 14% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 88.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon D-1577 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4110 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4110 and Xeon D-1577, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4110
Xeon Silver 4110
Intel Xeon D-1577
Xeon D-1577

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 18 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1577 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4110 or Xeon D-1577, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.