Core i5-7300HQ vs Xeon Silver 4110
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Silver 4110 outperforms i5-7300HQ by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i5-7300HQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 980 | 1517 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.25 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon Silver | Intel Core i5 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 11 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 3 January 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $501 | $250 |
| Current price | $153 (0.3x MSRP) | $888 (3.6x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i5-7300HQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 11 MB | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 77 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i5-7300HQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Socket P | Intel BGA1440 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i5-7300HQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i5-7300HQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i5-7300HQ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i5-7300HQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 6 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.212 GB/s | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i5-7300HQ.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon Silver 4110 outperforms Core i5-7300HQ by 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon Silver 4110 outperforms Core i5-7300HQ by 100% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i5-7300HQ outperforms Xeon Silver 4110 by 36% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon Silver 4110 outperforms Core i5-7300HQ by 53% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.60 | 3.29 |
| Recency | 11 July 2017 | 3 January 2017 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Cost | $501 | $250 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon Silver 4110 has a 100.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
i5-7300HQ, on the other hand, has its recommended price lower by $251, and 88.9% lower power consumption.
The Xeon Silver 4110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-7300HQ in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Silver 4110 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-7300HQ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i5-7300HQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
