Xeon 6325P vs Silver 4109T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4109T
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 70 Watt
6.44
Xeon 6325P
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
9.96
+54.7%

Xeon 6325P outperforms Xeon Silver 4109T by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1178881
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.0276.54
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency8.8717.47
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501$281

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6325P has 1804% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4109T.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.2 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache512 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache11 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA36471700
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon 6325P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Silver 4109T 6.44
Xeon 6325P 9.96
+54.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4109T 10348
Xeon 6325P 16013
+54.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.44 9.96
Recency 11 July 2017 24 February 2025
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon Silver 4109T has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon 6325P, on the other hand, has a 54.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 27.3% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 6325P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Silver 4109T in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4109T
Xeon Silver 4109T
Intel Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4109T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6325P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon 6325P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.