Turion Neo X2 L625 vs Xeon Silver 4108

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4108
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
5.61
+1978%
Turion Neo X2 L625
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.27

Xeon Silver 4108 outperforms Turion Neo X2 L625 by a whopping 1978% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4108 and Turion Neo X2 L625 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11403126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.98no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Silver2x AMD Turion Neo
Power efficiency6.25no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Congo (2009)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4108 and Turion Neo X2 L625 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache512 KB128 KB
L2 cache8 MB1 MB
L3 cache11 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature77 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4108 and Turion Neo X2 L625 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647ASB1 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Turion Neo X2 L625. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512HyperTransport 3.0, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
VirusProtect-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4108 and Turion Neo X2 L625 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Turion Neo X2 L625 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Turion Neo X2 L625. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Turion Neo X2 L625.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4108 5.61
+1978%
Turion Neo X2 L625 0.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4108 8909
+1962%
Turion Neo X2 L625 432

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.61 0.27
Recency 11 July 2017 1 October 2009
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 18 Watt

Xeon Silver 4108 has a 1977.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Turion Neo X2 L625, on the other hand, has 372.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4108 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion Neo X2 L625 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4108 is a server/workstation processor while Turion Neo X2 L625 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4108 and Turion Neo X2 L625, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4108
Xeon Silver 4108
AMD Turion Neo X2 L625
Turion Neo X2 L625

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 16 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4108 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Turion Neo X2 L625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4108 or Turion Neo X2 L625, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.