Ultra 7 165H vs Xeon Silver 4108

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4108
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
5.62
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
16.50
+194%

Core Ultra 7 165H outperforms Xeon Silver 4108 by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4108 and Core Ultra 7 165H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1151402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.62no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency6.2555.73
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417$460

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4108 and Core Ultra 7 165H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1622
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache512 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache11 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Maximum core temperature77 °C110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4108 and Core Ultra 7 165H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647Intel BGA 2049
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Core Ultra 7 165H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4108 and Core Ultra 7 165H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Core Ultra 7 165H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Core Ultra 7 165H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2300 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4108 and Core Ultra 7 165H.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes488

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4108 5.62
Ultra 7 165H 16.50
+194%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4108 8926
Ultra 7 165H 26214
+194%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.62 16.50
Recency 11 July 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 22
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 28 Watt

Ultra 7 165H has a 193.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 37.5% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 203.6% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 165H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4108 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4108 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 165H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4108 and Core Ultra 7 165H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4108
Xeon Silver 4108
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 16 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4108 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 44 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 165H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4108 or Core Ultra 7 165H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.