EPYC 9174F vs Xeon Platinum 9282

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 9174F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.73
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data10.33
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-AP (2019)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,850

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 9174F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads11232
Base clock speed2.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2641
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache77 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Number of transistors8,000 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 9174F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration82
SocketIntel BGA5903SP5
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 9174F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
SIPP+-
Precision Boost 2++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 9174F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 9174F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 9174F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TiB
Max memory channels12no data
Maximum memory bandwidth281.6 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 9174F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2019 10 November 2022
Physical cores 56 16
Threads 112 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 320 Watt

Xeon Platinum 9282 has 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

EPYC 9174F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 9174F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 9282 and EPYC 9174F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 9282
Xeon Platinum 9282
AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 376 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 9282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 9282 or EPYC 9174F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.