EPYC 7272 vs Xeon Platinum 9242
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 9242 and EPYC 7272 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 432 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 12.10 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.43 |
| Architecture codename | Cascade Lake-AP (2019) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $625 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 9242 and EPYC 7272 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 96 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 23 | 29 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 71.5 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 9242 and EPYC 7272 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA5903 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 9242 and EPYC 7272. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 9242 and EPYC 7272 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 9242 and EPYC 7272 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 9242 and EPYC 7272. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 12 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 281.6 GB/s | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 9242 and EPYC 7272.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 April 2019 | 7 August 2019 |
| Physical cores | 48 | 12 |
| Threads | 96 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 120 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 9242 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
EPYC 7272, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 9242 and EPYC 7272. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 9242 and EPYC 7272, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
