Xeon 6747P vs Platinum 8571N

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8571N
2023
52 cores / 104 threads, 300 Watt
38.70
Xeon 6747P
2025
48 cores / 96 threads, 330 Watt
57.14
+47.6%

Xeon 6747P outperforms Xeon Platinum 8571N by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9130
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.86no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency5.497.37
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameEmerald Rapids (2023)no data
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,839no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8571N and Xeon 6747P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores5248 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads10496
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache300 MB (shared)288 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size2x 763 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °Cno data
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8571N and Xeon 6747P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA4677FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt330 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Xeon 6747P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8571N and Xeon 6747P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXYes with Intel® SPS+
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Xeon 6747P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Xeon 6747P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s)
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Xeon 6747P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes8088

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Platinum 8571N 38.70
Xeon 6747P 57.14
+47.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8571N 68385
Samples: 1
Xeon 6747P 100964
+47.6%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.70 57.14
Recency 14 December 2023 1 January 2025
Physical cores 52 48
Threads 104 96
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 330 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8571N has 8.3% more physical cores and 8.3% more threads, and 10% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6747P, on the other hand, has a 47.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Intel Xeon 6747P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N
Intel Xeon 6747P
Xeon 6747P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8571N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6747P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Platinum 8571N and Xeon 6747P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.