Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G vs Xeon Platinum 8481C
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 8481C and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 986 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 1.99 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | no data |
| Release date | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 20 November 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8481C and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 56 (Hexapentaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 112 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 105 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 16 nm |
| Die size | 4x 477 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 79 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8481C and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 4677 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8481C and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8481C and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8481C and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8481C and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8481C and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 80 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 January 2023 | 20 November 2024 |
| Physical cores | 56 | 4 |
| Threads | 112 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 8481C has 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.
Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 2233.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8481C and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8481C is a server/workstation processor while Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8481C and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
