Ultra 5 245K vs Xeon Platinum 8460Y+
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 8460Y+ and Core Ultra 5 245K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 24 October 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,558 | $309 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8460Y+ and Core Ultra 5 245K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 40 (Tetraconta-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 80 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 105 MB | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 4x 477 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 76 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8460Y+ and Core Ultra 5 245K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 4677 | 1851 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8460Y+ and Core Ultra 5 245K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8460Y+ and Core Ultra 5 245K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8460Y+ and Core Ultra 5 245K are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8460Y+ and Core Ultra 5 245K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8460Y+ and Core Ultra 5 245K.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 80 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 January 2023 | 24 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 40 | 14 |
| Threads | 80 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 125 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 8460Y+ has 185.7% more physical cores and 471.4% more threads.
Ultra 5 245K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8460Y+ and Core Ultra 5 245K. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8460Y+ is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 245K is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8460Y+ and Core Ultra 5 245K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
