EPYC 7643P vs Xeon Platinum 8452Y

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8452Y
2023
36 cores / 72 threads, 300 Watt
2.26
EPYC 7643P
2023
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
48.08
+2027%

EPYC 7643P outperforms Xeon Platinum 8452Y by a whopping 2027% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking199050
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3215.81
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency0.298.26
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date10 January 2023 (2 years ago)5 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,995$2,722

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7643P has 4841% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8452Y and EPYC 7643P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3648 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads7296
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache67.5 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm7 nm
Die size4x 477 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8452Y and EPYC 7643P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4677SP3
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8452Y and EPYC 7643P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8452Y and EPYC 7643P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8452Y and EPYC 7643P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8452Y and EPYC 7643P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR5-4400DDR4
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8452Y and EPYC 7643P.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes80128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Platinum 8452Y 2.26
EPYC 7643P 48.08
+2027%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8452Y 3641
EPYC 7643P 77307
+2023%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.26 48.08
Recency 10 January 2023 5 September 2023
Physical cores 36 48
Threads 72 96
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 225 Watt

EPYC 7643P has a 2027.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7643P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Platinum 8452Y in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8452Y
Xeon Platinum 8452Y
AMD EPYC 7643P
EPYC 7643P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8452Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7643P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Platinum 8452Y and EPYC 7643P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.