Ryzen AI Max+ 388 vs Xeon Platinum 8368
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8368 outperforms Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by a whopping 190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 44 | 394 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 20.73 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| Release date | 6 April 2021 (4 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 38 | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 76 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 57 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 83 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | FCLGA4189 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 8 MB + 32 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 6 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 64 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 52.10 | 17.94 |
| Physical cores | 38 | 8 |
| Threads | 76 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 8 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 8368 has a 190.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 375% more physical cores and 375% more threads.
Ryzen AI Max+ 388, on the other hand, has 3275% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8368 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
