Ryzen 5 8600G vs Xeon Platinum 8368

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8368
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
60.15
+262%

Xeon Platinum 8368 outperforms Ryzen 5 8600G by a whopping 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 5 8600G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19414
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.03
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency20.3123.29
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 5 8600G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores386 (Hexa-Core)
Threads7612
Base clock speed2.4 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 5 8600G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189AM5
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 5 8600G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 5 8600G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 5 8600G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 5 8600G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 5 8600G.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8368 60.15
+262%
Ryzen 5 8600G 16.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8368 92054
+262%
Ryzen 5 8600G 25402

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 60.15 16.60
Recency 6 April 2021 8 January 2024
Physical cores 38 6
Threads 76 12
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8368 has a 262.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 533.3% more physical cores and 533.3% more threads.

Ryzen 5 8600G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 315.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 8600G in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8368 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 8600G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8368 and Ryzen 5 8600G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8368
Xeon Platinum 8368
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
Ryzen 5 8600G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 98 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 280 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8368 or Ryzen 5 8600G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.