i9-13900F vs Xeon Platinum 8368

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8368
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
60.15
+79.9%

Xeon Platinum 8368 outperforms Core i9-13900F by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8368 and Core i9-13900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19124
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.05
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency20.3146.93
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8368 and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3824 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads7632
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8368 and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8368 and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size6 TB192 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and Core i9-13900F.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8368 60.15
+79.9%
i9-13900F 33.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8368 92054
+79.9%
i9-13900F 51161

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 60.15 33.43
Recency 6 April 2021 4 January 2023
Physical cores 38 24
Threads 76 32
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8368 has a 79.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 58.3% more physical cores and 137.5% more threads.

i9-13900F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 315.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-13900F in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8368 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8368 and Core i9-13900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8368
Xeon Platinum 8368
Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 98 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 130 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8368 or Core i9-13900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.