Apple M2 Pro vs Xeon Platinum 8368

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8368
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
52.20
+320%

Xeon Platinum 8368 outperforms M2 Pro by a whopping 320% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking44684
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency20.73no data
DesignerIntelApple
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)no data
Release date6 April 2021 (4 years ago)17 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8368 and M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3812 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads7612
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)3.3 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)36 MB
L3 cache57 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8368 and M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4189no data
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt36 MB + 24 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8368 and M2 Pro technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and M2 Pro are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8368 and M2 Pro.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Platinum 8368 52.20
+320%
Apple M2 Pro 12.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8368 92054
+320%
Apple M2 Pro 21938
Samples: 808

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.20 12.44
Recency 6 April 2021 17 January 2023
Physical cores 38 12
Threads 76 12
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 36 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8368 has a 319.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 216.7% more physical cores and 533.3% more threads.

Apple M2 Pro, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8368 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M2 Pro in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8368 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8368
Xeon Platinum 8368
Apple M2 Pro
M2 Pro

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 101 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 229 votes

Rate M2 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Platinum 8368 and M2 Pro, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.