Xeon w9-3495X vs Platinum 8352Y

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021
32 cores / 64 threads
44.38
Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads
58.96
+32.9%

w9-3495X outperforms Platinum 8352Y by 33% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Xeon w9-3495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking4116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation13.83no data
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameno dataSapphire Rapids
Release date1 April 2021 (3 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$4822 no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Xeon w9-3495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads64112
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache48 MB105 MB
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Xeon w9-3495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Xeon w9-3495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Xeon w9-3495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXYes with Intel® SPS-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Xeon w9-3495X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Xeon w9-3495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Xeon w9-3495X.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes64112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y 44.38
Xeon w9-3495X 58.96
+32.9%

w9-3495X outperforms Platinum 8352Y by 33% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8352Y 68643
Xeon w9-3495X 91189
+32.8%

w9-3495X outperforms Platinum 8352Y by 33% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 44.38 58.96
Recency 1 April 2021 1 January 2023
Physical cores 32 56
Threads 64 112
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 350 Watt

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8352Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Xeon w9-3495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 170 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8352Y or Xeon w9-3495X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.