Ryzen 5 5500GT vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
44.38
+236%

Xeon Platinum 8352Y outperforms Ryzen 5 5500GT by a whopping 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 5 5500GT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking40539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.2986.08
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameno dataCezanne (2021−2022)
Release date1 April 2021 (3 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Current price$2000 $115

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 5500GT has 94% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 5 5500GT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads6412
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache48 MB16 MB
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 5 5500GT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA4189AM4
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 5 5500GT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 5 5500GT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 5 5500GT are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 5 5500GT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 5 5500GT.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes6416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y 44.38
+236%
Ryzen 5 5500GT 13.20

Xeon Platinum 8352Y outperforms Ryzen 5 5500GT by 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8352Y 68643
+236%
Ryzen 5 5500GT 20411

Xeon Platinum 8352Y outperforms Ryzen 5 5500GT by 236% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.38 13.20
Recency 1 April 2021 8 January 2024
Physical cores 32 6
Threads 64 12
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 5500GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8352Y is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 5500GT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 5 5500GT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT
Ryzen 5 5500GT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 83 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5500GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8352Y or Ryzen 5 5500GT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.