Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Xeon Platinum 8352M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8352M
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 185 Watt
29.08
+28%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
22.72

Xeon Platinum 8352M outperforms Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8352M and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking164232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency14.3038.29
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8352M and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads6424
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)12 MB
L3 cache48 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8352M and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4189FP8
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8352M and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8352M and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8352M and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8352M and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 890M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8352M and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.08 22.72
Recency 6 April 2021 25 July 2024
Physical cores 32 12
Threads 64 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 54 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8352M has a 28% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 242.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8352M is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8352M is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8352M and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8352M
Xeon Platinum 8352M
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8352M or Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.