Xeon w9-3495X vs Platinum 8280

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8280
2018
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
21.19
Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
58.53
+176%

w9-3495X outperforms Platinum 8280 by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon w9-3495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23317
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.38no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2019)Sapphire Rapids
Release date11 December 2018 (5 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,009no data
Current price$13123 (1.3x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon w9-3495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads56112
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)105 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °C81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon w9-3495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon w9-3495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon w9-3495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon w9-3495X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon w9-3495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon w9-3495X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8280 21.19
Xeon w9-3495X 58.53
+176%

w9-3495X outperforms Platinum 8280 by 176% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8280 32781
Xeon w9-3495X 90530
+176%

w9-3495X outperforms Platinum 8280 by 176% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.19 58.53
Recency 11 December 2018 1 January 2023
Physical cores 28 56
Threads 56 112
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 350 Watt

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8280 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon w9-3495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
Xeon Platinum 8280
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 80 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 175 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8280 or Xeon w9-3495X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.