Xeon W-3245M vs Platinum 8280

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8280
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
21.19
+22.2%

Platinum 8280 outperforms W-3245M by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-3245M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking234340
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.159.91
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon W
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,009$5,002
Current price$4715 (0.5x MSRP)$2000 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3245M has 92% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8280.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-3245M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads5632
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache1.75 MB1 MB
L2 cache28 MB16 MB
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature84 °C77 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-3245M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-3245M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-3245M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-3245M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-3245M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1 TB2 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-3245M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8280 21.19
+22.2%
Xeon W-3245M 17.34

Platinum 8280 outperforms W-3245M by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8280 32781
+22.3%
Xeon W-3245M 26814

Platinum 8280 outperforms W-3245M by 22% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.19 17.34
Recency 2 April 2019 3 June 2019
Physical cores 28 16
Threads 56 32
Cost $10009 $5002

The Xeon Platinum 8280 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3245M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-3245M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
Xeon Platinum 8280
Intel Xeon W-3245M
Xeon W-3245M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 80 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon W-3245M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8280 or Xeon W-3245M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.