Xeon Gold 6142 vs Platinum 8280

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8280
2018
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
20.64
+30.1%
Xeon Gold 6142
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
15.87

Xeon Platinum 8280 outperforms Xeon Gold 6142 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6142 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking270427
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.664.22
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency9.5210.01
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date11 December 2018 (6 years ago)25 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,009$2,946

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6142 has 154% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8280.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6142 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads5632
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2726
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature84 °C85 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6142 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6142. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6142 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6142 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6142. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size1 TB768 GB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6142.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8280 20.64
+30.1%
Xeon Gold 6142 15.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8280 32781
+30%
Xeon Gold 6142 25215

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.64 15.87
Recency 11 December 2018 25 April 2017
Physical cores 28 16
Threads 56 32
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8280 has a 30.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads.

Xeon Gold 6142, on the other hand, has 36.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8280 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6142 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon Gold 6142, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
Xeon Platinum 8280
Intel Xeon Gold 6142
Xeon Gold 6142

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 124 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6142 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8280 or Xeon Gold 6142, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.