Ultra 7 265F vs Xeon Platinum 8280

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8280 and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking264not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.66no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency9.52no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018−2019)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$10,009no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8280 and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads5620
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.75 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8280 and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA36471851
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8280 and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 28 20
Threads 56 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8280 has 40% more physical cores and 180% more threads.

Ultra 7 265F, on the other hand, has a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 215.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8280 and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8280 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8280 and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
Xeon Platinum 8280
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 124 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8280 or Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.