Xeon Gold 5317 vs Platinum 8268

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon Platinum 8268
2019
24 cores / 48 threads
22.51
+25.9%
Xeon Gold 5317
2021
12 cores / 24 threads
17.88

Platinum 8268 outperforms Gold 5317 by 26% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon Gold 5317 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking198305
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money8.4629.47
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2019)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years old)6 April 2021 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,302no data
Current price$3092 (0.5x MSRP)$930
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5317 has 248% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8268.

Technical specs

Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon Gold 5317 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4824
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache1.5 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature84 °C84 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon Gold 5317 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon Gold 5317. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon Gold 5317 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon Gold 5317 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon Gold 5317. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1 TB6 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon Gold 5317.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8268 22.51
+25.9%
Xeon Gold 5317 17.88

Platinum 8268 outperforms Gold 5317 by 26% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8268 34483
+25.9%
Xeon Gold 5317 27387

Platinum 8268 outperforms Gold 5317 by 26% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 22.51 17.88
Recency 2 April 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 150 Watt

The Xeon Platinum 8268 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5317 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon Gold 5317, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
Xeon Platinum 8268
Intel Xeon Gold 5317
Xeon Gold 5317

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 57 votes

Rate Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 20 votes

Rate Intel Xeon Gold 5317 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8268 or Xeon Gold 5317, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.