Xeon E7-8857 v2 vs Platinum 8268

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8268
2018
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
22.58
Xeon E7-8857 v2
2014
12 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
23.77
+5.3%

Xeon E7-8857 v2 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8268 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon E7-8857 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking236221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.76no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency10.0216.64
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018−2019)no data
Release date11 December 2018 (5 years ago)1 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,302no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon E7-8857 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4812
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)30 MB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature84 °C73 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon E7-8857 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)8
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon E7-8857 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon E7-8857 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon E7-8857 v2 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon E7-8857 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size1 TB1.5 TB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s85 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon E7-8857 v2.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4832

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8268 22.58
Xeon E7-8857 v2 23.77
+5.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8268 34483
Xeon E7-8857 v2 36304
+5.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.58 23.77
Recency 11 December 2018 1 January 2014
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8268 has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E7-8857 v2, on the other hand, has a 5.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 57.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon E7-8857 v2.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8268 and Xeon E7-8857 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
Xeon Platinum 8268
Intel Xeon E7-8857 v2
Xeon E7-8857 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 58 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8268 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 20 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8857 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8268 or Xeon E7-8857 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.