EPYC 7302P vs Xeon Platinum 8268

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon Platinum 8268
2018
24 cores / 48 threads
22.51
+5.7%
EPYC 7302P
2019
16 cores / 32 threads
21.29

Xeon Platinum 8268 outperforms EPYC 7302P by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8268 and EPYC 7302P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking201227
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money8.4618.29
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2019)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date11 December 2018 (5 years old)7 August 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,302$825
Current price$3092 (0.5x MSRP)$821 (1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7302P has 116% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8268.

Technical specs

Xeon Platinum 8268 and EPYC 7302P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8268 and EPYC 7302P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and EPYC 7302P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8268 and EPYC 7302P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and EPYC 7302P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and EPYC 7302P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8268 and EPYC 7302P.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8268 22.51
+5.7%
EPYC 7302P 21.29

Xeon Platinum 8268 outperforms EPYC 7302P by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8268 34483
+5.7%
EPYC 7302P 32612

Xeon Platinum 8268 outperforms EPYC 7302P by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 22.51 21.29
Recency 11 December 2018 7 August 2019
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 32
Cost $6302 $825
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 155 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8268 and EPYC 7302P. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8268 and EPYC 7302P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
Xeon Platinum 8268
AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 57 votes

Rate Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 26 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8268 or EPYC 7302P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.