Threadripper PRO 7995WX vs Xeon Platinum 8260M

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8260M and Threadripper PRO 7995WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking251not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.95no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency12.26no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018−2019)Storm Peak (2023)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,705no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Threadripper PRO 7995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)96
Threads48192
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data12x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8260M and Threadripper PRO 7995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647SP5
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Threadripper PRO 7995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Threadripper PRO 7995WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Threadripper PRO 7995WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Threadripper PRO 7995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 24 96
Threads 48 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 350 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8260M has 112.1% lower power consumption.

Threadripper PRO 7995WX, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8260M and Threadripper PRO 7995WX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8260M is a server/workstation processor while Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8260M and Threadripper PRO 7995WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
Xeon Platinum 8260M
AMD Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8260M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 109 votes

Rate Threadripper PRO 7995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8260M or Threadripper PRO 7995WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.