Ryzen 9 3900X vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8260M outperforms Ryzen 9 3900X by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 9 3900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 237 | 254 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 9.82 | 22.37 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | AMD Ryzen 9 |
| Architecture codename | Cascade Lake-SP (2019) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 7 July 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $7,705 | $499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 9 3900X has 128% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8260M.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 9 3900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 24 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.5 MB | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 24 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 35.75 MB (shared) | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 19,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 9 3900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 (Multiprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 9 3900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| Status | Launched | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 9 3900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 9 3900X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 9 3900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 6 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 140.8 GB/s | 51.196 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 9 3900X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.96 | 21.10 |
| Recency | 2 April 2019 | 7 July 2019 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 12 |
| Threads | 48 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 105 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 8260M has a 4.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen 9 3900X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 57.1% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 9 3900X.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8260M is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 9 3900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
