Ryzen 5 5500 vs Xeon Platinum 8260M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8260M
2018
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
21.96
+74.7%

Xeon Platinum 8260M outperforms Ryzen 5 5500 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 5 5500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking221569
Place by popularitynot in top-1002
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data59.30
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2019)Cezanne (2021−2022)
Release date11 December 2018 (5 years ago)4 April 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,705no data
Current price$14619 (1.9x MSRP)$157

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 5 5500 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 5 5500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads4812
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors8,000 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 5 5500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM4
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 5 5500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 5 5500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 5 5500 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 5 5500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 5 5500.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8260M 21.96
+74.7%
Ryzen 5 5500 12.57

Xeon Platinum 8260M outperforms Ryzen 5 5500 by 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8260M 33970
+74.8%
Ryzen 5 5500 19436

Xeon Platinum 8260M outperforms Ryzen 5 5500 by 75% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.96 12.57
Recency 11 December 2018 4 April 2022
Physical cores 24 6
Threads 48 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon Platinum 8260M is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 5500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8260M is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 5500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8260M and Ryzen 5 5500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
Xeon Platinum 8260M
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
Ryzen 5 5500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8260M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7007 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8260M or Ryzen 5 5500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.