Xeon Silver 4210 vs Platinum 8260

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8260
2018
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
19.10
+124%
Xeon Silver 4210
2019
10 cores / 20 threads, 85 Watt
8.51

Xeon Platinum 8260 outperforms Xeon Silver 4210 by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Silver 4210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking302887
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.0919.52
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency10.959.47
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date11 December 2018 (5 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,702$501

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4210 has 221% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8260.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Silver 4210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads4820
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier2422
L1 cache64 KB (per core)640 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)10 MB
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)13.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C78 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Silver 4210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Silver 4210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Silver 4210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Silver 4210 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Silver 4210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size1 TB1 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Silver 4210.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8260 19.10
+124%
Xeon Silver 4210 8.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8260 30347
+124%
Xeon Silver 4210 13520

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.10 8.51
Recency 11 December 2018 2 April 2019
Physical cores 24 10
Threads 48 20
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8260 has a 124.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 140% more physical cores and 140% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4210, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 94.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8260 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4210 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Silver 4210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
Xeon Platinum 8260
Intel Xeon Silver 4210
Xeon Silver 4210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 14 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 46 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8260 or Xeon Silver 4210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.