EPYC 9375F vs Xeon Platinum 8260

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8260 and EPYC 9375F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking306not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.99no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency10.95no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018)Turin (2024)
Release date11 December 2018 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,702$5,306

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8260 and EPYC 9375F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads4864
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8260 and EPYC 9375F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP5
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8260 and EPYC 9375F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8260 and EPYC 9375F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8260 and EPYC 9375F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8260 and EPYC 9375F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8260 and EPYC 9375F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2018 10 October 2024
Physical cores 24 32
Threads 48 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 320 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8260 has 93.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9375F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8260 and EPYC 9375F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8260 and EPYC 9375F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
Xeon Platinum 8260
AMD EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9375F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 14 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9375F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8260 or EPYC 9375F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.