Xeon w3-2425 vs Platinum 8256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8256
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 105 Watt
10.99
Xeon w3-2425
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
12.22
+11.2%

Xeon w3-2425 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8256 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8256 and Xeon w3-2425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking721643
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.9448.49
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency9.528.55
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,007$529

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w3-2425 has 2399% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8256.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8256 and Xeon w3-2425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)15 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data64 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8256 and Xeon w3-2425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8256 and Xeon w3-2425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
StatusLaunchedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8256 and Xeon w3-2425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8256 and Xeon w3-2425 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8256 and Xeon w3-2425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size1 TB2 TB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8256 and Xeon w3-2425.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8256 10.99
Xeon w3-2425 12.22
+11.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8256 16787
Xeon w3-2425 18655
+11.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.99 12.22
Recency 2 April 2019 15 February 2023
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8256 has 23.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon w3-2425, on the other hand, has a 11.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Xeon w3-2425 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8256 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8256 and Xeon w3-2425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8256
Xeon Platinum 8256
Intel Xeon w3-2425
Xeon w3-2425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon w3-2425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8256 or Xeon w3-2425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.