Xeon Gold 5115 vs Platinum 8253

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8253
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
17.73
+91.9%
Xeon Gold 5115
2017
10 cores / 20 threads, 85 Watt
9.24

Xeon Platinum 8253 outperforms Xeon Gold 5115 by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8253 and Xeon Gold 5115 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking345823
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.194.48
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency13.4210.29
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date11 December 2018 (5 years ago)11 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,115$1,221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8253 has 83% better value for money than Xeon Gold 5115.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8253 and Xeon Gold 5115 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3220
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier2224
L1 cache64 KB (per core)640 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)10 MB
L3 cache22 MB (shared)13.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature87 °C76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)87 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8253 and Xeon Gold 5115 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8253 and Xeon Gold 5115. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8253 and Xeon Gold 5115 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8253 and Xeon Gold 5115 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8253 and Xeon Gold 5115. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size1 TB768 GB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8253 and Xeon Gold 5115.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8253 17.73
+91.9%
Xeon Gold 5115 9.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8253 28165
+91.9%
Xeon Gold 5115 14677

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.73 9.24
Recency 11 December 2018 11 July 2017
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 32 20
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8253 has a 91.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads.

Xeon Gold 5115, on the other hand, has 47.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8253 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5115 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8253 and Xeon Gold 5115, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8253
Xeon Platinum 8253
Intel Xeon Gold 5115
Xeon Gold 5115

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8253 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5115 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8253 or Xeon Gold 5115, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.