Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon Platinum 8253
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8253 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G by a whopping 302% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 478 | 1582 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 27 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.91 | 8.90 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | 13.70 | 6.55 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| Release date | 2 April 2019 (6 years ago) | 12 June 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,115 | $99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 3 3200G has 366% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8253.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8253 and Ryzen 3 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Multiplier | 22 | 36 |
| L1 cache | 1 MB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 22 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 209.78 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 87 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 87 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 4940 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8253 and Ryzen 3 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 (Multiprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8253 and Ryzen 3 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8253 and Ryzen 3 3200G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8253 and Ryzen 3 3200G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8253 and Ryzen 3 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 6 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 140.8 GB/s | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon Vega 8 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8253 and Ryzen 3 3200G.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.97 | 3.97 |
| Recency | 2 April 2019 | 12 June 2019 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 8253 has a 302.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
Ryzen 3 3200G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8253 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8253 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3200G is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
