Ryzen AI Max 390 vs Xeon Platinum 8180M
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI Max 390 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8180M by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 332 | 166 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | no data |
| Power efficiency | 8.82 | 49.07 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| Release date | 11 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $13,011 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8180M and Ryzen AI Max 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 28 (Octacosa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 56 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 25 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 38.5 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 84 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8180M and Ryzen AI Max 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | FP11 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8180M and Ryzen AI Max 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8180M and Ryzen AI Max 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8180M and Ryzen AI Max 390 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8180M and Ryzen AI Max 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR5X |
| Maximum memory size | 1.5 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 128.001 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 8050S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8180M and Ryzen AI Max 390.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.90 | 28.91 |
| Recency | 11 July 2017 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 28 | 12 |
| Threads | 56 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 55 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 8180M has 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.
Ryzen AI Max 390, on the other hand, has a 53% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 272.7% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8180M is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI Max 390 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
