Xeon Silver 4210 vs Platinum 8175M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8175M
24 cores / 48 threads
17.42
+97.3%

Xeon Platinum 8175M outperforms Xeon Silver 4210 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Silver 4210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking384884
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.72
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiencyno data9.47
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$501

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Silver 4210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads4820
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier2522
L1 cache1.5 MB640 KB
L2 cache24 MB10 MB
L3 cache33 MB13.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Silver 4210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSocket PFCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)no data85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Silver 4210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Silver 4210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Silver 4210 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Silver 4210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size1,536 GB tdp=240 Watt1 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Silver 4210.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 17.42
+97.3%
Xeon Silver 4210 8.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 26659
+97.2%
Xeon Silver 4210 13520

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.42 8.83
Physical cores 24 10
Threads 48 20

Xeon Platinum 8175M has a 97.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 140% more physical cores and 140% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8175M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4210 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Silver 4210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
Xeon Platinum 8175M
Intel Xeon Silver 4210
Xeon Silver 4210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 26 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8175M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 46 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8175M or Xeon Silver 4210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.