Xeon Platinum 8124 vs Platinum 8175M

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Platinum 8124 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking377not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon Platinum
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Platinum 8124 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads4836
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2530
L1 cache1.5 MB1.125 MB
L2 cache24 MB18 MB
L3 cache33 MB24.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Platinum 8124 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)8 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSocket PSocket P
Power consumption (TDP)no data240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Platinum 8124. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Platinum 8124 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Platinum 8124 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Platinum 8124. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size1,536 GB tdp=240 Watt768 GB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Platinum 8124.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 24 18
Threads 48 36

Xeon Platinum 8175M has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Platinum 8124. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Platinum 8124, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
Xeon Platinum 8175M
Intel Xeon Platinum 8124
Xeon Platinum 8124

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 26 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8175M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8124 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8175M or Xeon Platinum 8124, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.