Xeon Max 9480 vs Platinum 8175M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8175M
24 cores / 48 threads
16.12
Xeon Max 9480
2023, $12,980
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
47.33
+194%

Xeon Max 9480 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8175M by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking49163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.57
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiencyno data5.71
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023)
Release dateno data10 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$12,980

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Max 9480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads48112
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.5 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB112.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data64 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Max 9480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSocket P4677
Power consumption (TDP)no data350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Max 9480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Max 9480 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Max 9480 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Max 9480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1,536 GB tdp=240 Wattno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Max 9480.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4880

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 16.12
Xeon Max 9480 47.33
+194%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 28244
Samples: 3
Xeon Max 9480 82913
+194%
Samples: 13

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.12 47.33
Physical cores 24 56
Threads 48 112
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

Xeon Max 9480 has a 193.6% higher aggregate performance score, 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Max 9480 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
Xeon Platinum 8175M
Intel Xeon Max 9480
Xeon Max 9480

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8175M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 12 votes

Rate Xeon Max 9480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon Max 9480, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.