Xeon E5-2696 V3 vs Platinum 8175M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8175M
24 cores / 48 threads
17.24
+19.7%
Xeon E5-2696 V3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
14.40

Platinum 8175M outperforms E5-2696 V3 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2696 V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking338467
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.3046.39
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Haswell-EP (2014)
Release dateno data8 September 2014 (9 years ago)
Current price$540 $122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 has 1306% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8175M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2696 V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads4836
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache1.5 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache33 MB45 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data356 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data77 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2696 V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSocket P2011-3
Power consumption (TDP)no data145 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2696 V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2696 V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2696 V3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2696 V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3, DDR42133 MHz Quad-channel
Maximum memory size1,536 GB tdp=240 Wattno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2696 V3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 17.24
+19.7%
Xeon E5-2696 V3 14.40

Platinum 8175M outperforms E5-2696 V3 by 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8175M 26659
+19.7%
Xeon E5-2696 V3 22274

Platinum 8175M outperforms E5-2696 V3 by 20% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.24 14.40
Physical cores 24 18
Threads 48 36
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm

The Xeon Platinum 8175M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2696 V3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2696 V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
Xeon Platinum 8175M
Intel Xeon E5-2696 V3
Xeon E5-2696 V3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 26 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8175M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 1108 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8175M or Xeon E5-2696 V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.