Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Platinum 8175M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8175M
24 cores / 48 threads
17.24
+49.8%
Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.51

Platinum 8175M outperforms E5-2680 v4 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2680 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking341630
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.3028.55
Market segmentServerWorkstation
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon (Desktop)
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Broadwell-EP (2016)
Release dateno data10 March 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,745
Current price$540 $126 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 765% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8175M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2680 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads4828
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus supportno data9.6 GT/s / QPI
L1 cache1.5 MB448 KB
L2 cache24 MB3.5 MB
L3 cache33 MB35 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data306 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data86 °C
Number of transistorsno data4700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2680 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSocket PFCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2680 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2680 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2680 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2680 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size1,536 GB tdp=240 Watt1.5 TB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2680 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 17.24
+49.8%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.51

Platinum 8175M outperforms E5-2680 v4 by 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8175M 26659
+49.7%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 17807

Platinum 8175M outperforms E5-2680 v4 by 50% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.24 11.51
Physical cores 24 14
Threads 48 28

The Xeon Platinum 8175M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2680 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8175M and Xeon E5-2680 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
Xeon Platinum 8175M
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 26 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8175M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 3189 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8175M or Xeon E5-2680 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.