EPYC 7303 vs Xeon Platinum 8175M
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7303 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8175M by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 514 | 455 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 23.31 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 5.29 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | no data | 5 September 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $604 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7303 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 25 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.5 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 24 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 33 MB | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 8,300 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7303 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 (Multiprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | Socket P | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7303. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7303 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7303 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7303. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB tdp=240 Watt | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 128.001 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7303.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.12 | 16.20 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 16 |
| Threads | 48 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Xeon Platinum 8175M has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
EPYC 7303, on the other hand, has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M and AMD EPYC 7303.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
