EPYC 4364P vs Xeon Platinum 8175M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8175M
24 cores / 48 threads
15.17
EPYC 4364P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
19.81
+30.6%

EPYC 4364P outperforms Xeon Platinum 8175M by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking499328
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data45.59
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiencyno data7.97
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Raphael (2023−2025)
Release dateno data21 May 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 4364P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speedno data4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz5.4 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 4364P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketSocket PAM5
Power consumption (TDP)no data105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 4364P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 4364P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 4364P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 4364P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size1,536 GB tdp=240 Wattno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 4364P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4828

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 15.17
EPYC 4364P 19.81
+30.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 26659
Samples: 2
EPYC 4364P 34811
+30.6%
Samples: 7

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.17 19.81
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Xeon Platinum 8175M has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

EPYC 4364P, on the other hand, has a 30.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 4364P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
Xeon Platinum 8175M
AMD EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8175M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4364P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 4364P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.